As many people know, the jury sided with Johnny Depp in his lawsuit against ex-wife Amber Heard that day. True, the judge reduced the damages he sought for defamation from $15 million to $10.35 million based on a Virginia law that limits the number of fines.
In turn, Amber Heard won $2 million in damages for her anti-defamation claim. But the actress’s lawyer, Eileen Breedhot, said, Thursday, that Heard’s next step would be to appeal the ruling, and confirmed that the actress would not be able to pay damages. Additionally, Bredehoft reported last week that Amber, 36, has spent more than $6 million in legal fees.
Legal analyst Emily de Becker explained what would happen if Amber Heard couldn’t pay all those bills: solutions,” Becker says.
Ben Cho said in his closing remarks that Johnny Depp did not seek to punish Amber Heard with money. They will try to settle this issue, and you will see the PR statement that they are not looking to enforce the decision.
But if Depp wanted to implement the decision, this would start a whole separate process in court, potentially linked to the confiscation of property and finding ways to pay the claim.
If you’re part of Depp’s team, I think they should get an injunction preventing Amber Heard from repeating statements that the jury deemed defamatory and then stating that the payments would not be made and there would be no judgment.
If Depp is not interested in money, he thinks it’s more important for him to make sure she doesn’t repeat the accusations. Getting rule is one thing.
Getting the money is completely different,” the lawyer said, “suppose that Depp’s side did not get the money. In this case, they can seize the property and, as the expert says, they try to recover any wages or fees that come from it. In and begin to seek it through the courts, but This is a separate process that starts after a decision is made, and can be quite long to implement.
Protected by Patchstack